"Our certainty that model Wankels will soon be here
stems not only form the Graupner efforts, but from the strong rumors that others model engine makers
are engaged in development (Webra is supposed to be well along with a design, for for example). There
very probably is a Wankel in your future...!" That is the closing line from
this article in the June 1968 edition of AAM, reporting on the new-fangled Wankel rotatory engines and
their supposed superiority and therefore inevitability. Unfortunately, the problems plaguing Wankel
production models - both model and full-size engines - never were overcome to the point that they would
become a ubiquitous product. Low parts count, low friction, low vibration, and quiet operation could
have been a game changer, but alas, it was not to be.
See the OS-Graupner
Wankel engine advertisement that began appearing in a World Engines advertisement in the March 1972
issue of American Aircraft Modeler.
There's a Wankel in Your Future
It may look like no engine you have seen before and it apparently runs by black magic. Smaller, lighter,
more potent, it's a comer.
SOME months ago we noticed a line on the cover of a popular
mechanical mag; which touted an article on the latest "R/C engines." Thinking the products of some of
our model plane powerplant makers had hit the big time, we grabbed a copy.
The story was interesting, but it had nothing to do with our size engines. It described the latest
version of a rotary combustion engine, a design known as the Wankel, after the German inventor. These
engines were first heard of around 1959; have been under intensive development in many countries ever
since. Actually, they are not unknown in our field. An Orion, powered by a homemade Wankel built by
Floyd Neal, was demon-strated at the 1962 Chicago Nats - more on Neal's interesting designs later.
One of the first Wankels to run in this country was built by William Thomas and Bill Jr. in March, 1960.
Shown are the ro-tor. shaft with eccentric, and trochoid cavity. This was a side-port design.
Later Thomas design was this five-lober which gave two firing impulses per shaft rotation. Diameter
was 3-3/4". Turned 14-6 prop at 5,000 rpm. Merely experimental, no effort to save weight.
Figure 1 - INTAKE (almost complete)
Long intake manifolds on this Thomas Wankel were found to increase efficiency. All the Thomas engines
were bench run, but were not flown. Spark ignition was used. Note balance weight at the rear.
There have been many attempts at designing a successful rotary combustion engine - and there will
doubtless be many more. But the design of Felix Wankel, a German scientist, looks like the most practical
yet. So much so, that the idea was taken over by the German NSU concern (makers of motorcycles, autos)
way back in 1951. First use of the idea was for a small compressor in 1956; it was fitted to a conventional
motorcycle engine which set a speed record at the Utah salt flats.
Curtiss Wright Corp. secured rights to manufacture Wankel engines in the U. S., but has concentrated
mostly in development of larger sizes -100 hp and over. C- W has, however, built and tested engines
in all sizes from one of a couple horsepower fitted to a power lawnmower, up to several hundred, both
liquid and air-cooled. They have driven extensively a standard U. S.-made auto, fitted with one of their
engines. No such car is known to be anywhere near sale in the U. S. at present; but you can buy one
from Germany (NSU has them now and Mercedes is working hard on one), and from Japan (the Toyo Kogyo
concern). Some 20 concerns allover the world are licensed to build Wankels. And you can be certain the
U. S. auto makers are hard at work on the same thing!
Why all the interest and excitement? The Wankel has many advantages over conventional engines, for
a wide variety of purposes. First, it is much smaller, simpler and lighter than even two-cycle engines.
The basic Wankel (not including accessories) has only two moving parts. Furthermore, these parts do
not operate on a start-stop-reverse sequence as do the piston and other components in conventional engines;
those two parts are always rotating in the same direction.
This conserves power, reduces friction and above all, makes it possible to balance the Wankel almost
perfectly. Because of only two parts, there's lots less to go wrong. Machining is a bit tricky - mainly
because it's entirely different from that of conventional engines, but special tooling is rapidly being
Present-day Wankels of automotive size can produce the same power in about half the weight and size
of a standard engine. They are at least as economical in fuel. And they run smooth as silk! These same
advantages will be seen soon in outboard engines (several U. S. outboard makers are well along in this
field) . Lawnmower and other small units may be next.
Like everything else, there are some disadvantages - though constant development is overcoming even
these. One is sealing the rotor inside its chamber. Another is wear. Recent reports claim that these
problems have been practically licked, however.
It takes some study to understand how the Wankel operates, even though it has so few parts. Take
a look at Fig. 1. The "cylinder" or chamber in which the triangular rotor operates is almost an oval,
but not quite; there is a slight waisting - in at two points to form a very fat figure 8, a shape called
a "trochoid." The three-pointed rotor has surfaces that are a bit rounded from tip to tip; also, as
indicated in dotted lines in Fig. 1, there is a slight depression on each face. Now comes the tricky
part! The shaft (you can't call it a "crankshaft" as there's no crank - better term it an "eccentric
shaft") rotates in the center of the trochoidal cavity, and has an' eccentric attached. The center of
the rotor fits over this eccentric.
Key to the whole operation is two gears. The smaller is fastened rigidly and does not turn; Fig.
1 shows only the center portion of the engine body, but there are, of course, two end plates. The fixed
gear is attached permanently to one of these. The small ring centered around the shaft in our five sketches
represents this fixed gear, which has teeth on its outer periphery. Engaging these are teeth cut on
the inside of the rotor. Thus, as the shaft is rotated (it's probably easier initially to envision the
action by having the shaft turn the rotor, rather than the opposite, as occurs when the engine is running),
the eccentric "wobbles" the rotor around the shaft. At the same time however, the gear teeth assure
that the rotor turns around the eccentric, to keep the rotor points from jamming into the chamber walls.
To keep everything moving correctly, there must be two-thirds as many teeth on the stationary gear
as there are teeth inside the rotor. And this results in the rotor making a third of a revolution for
each full revolution of the main shaft. Let's follow through as one face of the rotor goes through the
sequence of intake compression-firing-exhaust.
At Fig. 1, face 1 on the rotor is well along on the intake and is just about to start compressing
the fuel mixture it has drawn in through the intake port. At 2A, compression has started. The eccentric
and gear teeth are moving the triangle so that face 1 is approaching the wall of the enclosure, thus
compressing the fuel. At 2B the spark plug fires (or it could be a glow plug which ignites the fuel
at this point). In 2C, the rotor face is moving away from the wall, forced to do so by the expanding
gases, and at the same time the rotor is pushing upon the eccentric to turn the shaft. At 2D the advancing
tip of rotor face 1 has cleared the exhaust port, and the gases rush out.
Wankel, installed in Orion was built by Floyd Neal, and flown during 1962 Nationals. Interesting point
is pivoted flap over the exhaust port. Neal flew earlier Wankel ill 1961 Smog Hog.
As with Thomas engines, rotor is lapped to snug fit between two side plates.
Falecki SW-92. Weight of this neat design is 35 ozs. Outside diameter is 31j2'. Dis-placement is 9.2
cc. Produces 1 hp at 12,000 rpm. Note periphery intake. Maximum power developed so far, 1-1/2.
An early Polish Wankel was produced by J. Falecki. Run on both glow and spark ignition, it produces
1-1/2 hp, has turned 21,000 rpm. Diameter is 3-3/8", weight 75 ozs. The displacement is 9.2 cc.
Water-cooled Wankel, S. Gorski, Poland. Believed first marine Wankel in Europe. Twelve cc displacement,
29 oz. bare weight-less flywheel, pull-starter. Turned 23,000, 1-1/2 hp at 12,000.
Most famous of the Wankels is the well-publicized Graupner which was seen at last year's Radio Control
World Championships at Corsica. The continuous, smooth rotational process reduces vibration.
Rotor face 1 is not doing all the work. of course. As it goes through the above cycle, faces 2 and
3 are just a jump or two ahead, and the shaft is thus being turned almost continuously. This is one
reason for the "silky smoothness" that most test drivers have commented upon, who have driven Wankel-propelled
autos. This, and the almost perfect balance of the engine. We have not shown any balance weights in
Fig. 1, as they would just confuse matters. But picture an off-center weight on one or both ends of
the main shaft, and attach just opposite to the fat part of the eccentric. The weight would be just
enough to perfectly balance the off-center weight of the eccentric itself, and the rotor it is driven
As can be seen, Wankel operation is a continuous smooth rotational process - not a harsh start-stop-reverse
procedure, as in conventional engines. Though it has no moving valves as such, and draws in fuel mixture
and shoots out exhaust fumes through ports (as in a two-cycle engine), the Wankel is a true four-stroke-cycle
design. The style we show here is therefore equivalent to a two-cylinder, four-stroke of the usual design,
or to a single-cylinder two-stroke - in number of "explosions" per revolution of the shaft - but the
other advantages make it vastly superior to either.
We have shown an engine with both intake and exhaust ports on the cavity periphery. Some designers
(Curtiss-Wright among them) prefer to put the intake port on the side of the housing; this has been
found to increase low-speed torque and fuel economy at partial throttle opening - matters of little
consequence to model engine users. Probably one of the first Wankel engines to run in the U. S. (other
than those of Curtiss-Wright) was one built in a home shop by the team of William Thomas and Bill Thomas
Jr. (Daytona Beach, Fla.); it was fired up in March, 1960. A photo of it with one side plate removed
shows rotor, shaft with eccentric, and the trochoid cavity. The two gears are on the opposite side of
the rotor. Note that this engine has a side port. Lightly spring-loaded metal strips at the rotor tips
are for sealing. Bill Jr. says machining and sealing left much to be desired, but the engine did run.
No effort was made to reduce weight (overall dia. was 4-1/2", weight was 9 lb.) or attain high power.
An external view of this engine was carried on page 5 (July-Aug. 1963 issue of A. M.) and showed later
Thomas developments in five-lobe rotors (the only ones of this type we've heard of).
The five-lober gives two firing pulses per shaft rotation, is thus equivalent to a four-cylinder,
four-cycle conventional type. Another photo shows the most re-cent- Thomas five-lober; it is 3-3/4"
OD, turns the four-blade 14-6 prop at 500 rpm, weighs 3-1/2 lb. Again, no effort was made at weight
reduction. The Thomas' are interested mainly in engine develop-ment, and their creations have only been
bench-run. They have used spark ignition on all their engines to date. The long intake manifolds seen
in one photo were found to increase efficiency. Note the balance weight on near side of this engine.
As mentioned earlier, Floyd Neal (St. Louis) flew a Wankel-Orion combo at the '62 Chicago Nats. Photo
shows underside of the engine (Floyd also favors the side intake port) and interesting point here is
the pivoted flap over the exhaust port, coupled to the intake throttle. As with the Thomas engines (and
apparently with most small-sized Wankels) the rotor is lapped to a snug fit between the two side plates
(larger engines employ spring-loaded strips on the sides as well as at the triangle tips). The fixed
gear may be seen attached to the right-hand side plate. Below this is the counterweight that balances
the off-center eccentric and rotor. Though the shaft at bottom is so-placed that you can't see there
is an eccentric, there really is - it's the fat area toward the right end.
Floyd ran his first Wankel in Nov., 1960. It was later installed in a Smog Hog, and flown on Feb.
23, 1961 - prob-ably the first Wankel-powered model flown in the U. S. Actually, Floyd is the only modeler
we've been able to trace who has flown a model Wankel in the States - but there must have been others.
The engine we show here was very much the same, but simply refined. That Nats flight was its first time
in the air! The plane and engine were flown continuously for two years thereafter.
This particular engine has .50 cu. in. displacement, turns a 12-6 prop at 12,000 rpm. Body size is
2-3/4 x 3", length is 4" and weight is 20 oz. This engine (as was the first one) is entirely of steel
and cast iron, but Floyd started a copy with considerable aluminum to lower weight; however, at last
reports it hadn't been completed. This builder has been so impressed with the Wankel design advantages
that he purchased an NSU Spyder, which has a 64 hp R/C powerplant.
We spotted several model Wankels in the very comprehensive manual entitled "Miniature Combustion
Engines," a 436-page Volume published in Poland (inter-ested readers could obtain a copy from author
Wieslaw Schier, Sulejowek k/ Warszawy, ul. Okiewska 1, Poland - and even if you can't understand Polish
this very profusely illustrated book is extremely interesting). Mr. Schier kindly sent us pix of several
Polish model Wankels; one of the first in that country was the SWT-1 produced by J. Falecki. It has
been run on both glow and spark ignition, has 9.2 cc displacement and has produced as much as 1-1/2
hp. Diameter is about 3-3/8" and weight is about 75 oz. It has run at over 21,000 rpm with little loss
of power, will idle at 4500 rpm on glow. Partial plans for this engine (enough for an experienced builder
to follow) are in the Shier book.
An SG-X water-cooled engine built by S. Gorski was used in a model boat in 1963. This is felt to
have been the first Wankel-powered model boat in Europe .. This is a 12 cc displacement engine, weighs
about 29 oz. bare (less flywheel, pull starter and other auxiliaries). It produces 1-1/2 hp at 12,000
rpm, has run as high as 23,000 with no problems.
Another Falecki engine, the SW -92, is a neat design completely detailed in the Schier book. It weighs
about 35 oz., has an outside diameter of 3-1/2" and 9.2 cc displacement. This glow engine will pro-duce
1 hp at 12,000 rpm, and a maximum of 1-1/2 hp. All the operational figures we have quoted were given
by the engine designers. Note that the SWT-1 and the SW -92 have periphery intakes. In the photo of
the Gorski you can see one counterweight, which is apparently ma-chined from the same piece that the
prop is tightened against. There is a similar counterweight at the rear of this engine. The counterweight
of the SWT-1 is part of the two-diameter circular section to the right of the main engine body; this
entire section rotates with the eccentric shaft.
All the model engines we have depicted so far are the work of ingenious experi-menters, and doubtless
all one-of-a-kind. So where can you buy a Wankel for your new R/C plane? Well, you can't as this is
written - but you might by the time it's printed! For the German Graupner concern demonstrated their
engine at the 1967 R/C World Championships, and con-siderable data on it was given in the "New in R/C"
section, Nov. '67. It was shown at Toledo this year. Briefly, it's a .25 cu. in. job, measures about
3" dia. x 3" long, weighs 13 oz. (production engines will be around 9-10 oz.) and is a glow engine.
It turns a 10-4 nylon prop at 12,000 rpm, but later versions do quite a bit better. It is extremely
smooth in operation, a fact we personally verified at the Graupner plant - by the simple but certain
"hand-on-the-fuselage" test.! The dark line around the center of the engine is the cast iron "cylinder"
inside which the triangular rotor moves. This is the "working" portion of the engine; the lighter colored
sections fore and aft house the counterweights, bearings, etc., and of course, help in cooling and mounting.
No exhaust damper is utilized on this engine, but idling speed seemed reasonably low. This engine started
just a hobby project by an engineer of the Wankel-NSU group; it is thus backed by the vast know-how
these pioneers have accumulated in this form of R/C engine.
Our certainty that model Wankels will soon be here stems not only form the Graupner efforts, but
from the strong rumors that others model engine makers are engaged in development (Webra is supposed
to be well along with a design, for for example). There very probably is a
Wankel in your future...!
Posted September 24, 2011